Back to Research
Methodology
Read time5 min readUpdatedDecember 2025

The 7.4-Second Signal Model

Every resume tells a story. Here is how we measure first-impression signal and what you can do about it.

The Core Principle

Story First

Internal rubric: narrative coherence is the primary dimension we emphasize in scoring, above keywords or formatting.

Sample
Internal synthesis informed by recruiter behavior research

Why resumes fail

Most resumes are lists of responsibilities disguised as accomplishments. "Managed a team of 5" tells me nothing. "Scaled product org from 2 to 5 PMs while shipping 3 major releases" tells me you can build.

The difference is not just word choice. It is narrative structure. Good resumes answer an implicit question: "Why should I believe this person can do the job I'm hiring for?"

The four dimensions

We score resumes across four dimensions, weighted by how strongly they shape recruiter impressions. Each dimension is scored 0-100 based on how clearly your resume signals that quality.

Story (Highest Weight)

Is there a coherent narrative? Can I tell where you've been, what you've done, and where you're going? This is the most important signal.

Impact

Do you quantify outcomes? Numbers, percentages, revenue, users: concrete evidence that you moved the needle.

Clarity

Is your language precise and jargon-free? Can a non-expert understand what you actually did?

Readability

Is the formatting clean? Are bullets scannable? Does the visual hierarchy guide the recruiter's eye?

Why Story matters most

When a recruiter opens your resume, they are not reading. They are pattern-matching. They're asking: "Does this person make sense for this role?"

A strong Story score means your career progression is legible. Your job titles connect. Your accomplishments build on each other. The recruiter doesn't have to work to understand who you are.

A weak Story score means there are gaps, inconsistencies, or missing context. You might be a great candidate, but you are making the recruiter do the mental labor of piecing it together. In the initial screen window, they will not.1

What the scores mean

These thresholds are internal heuristics based on recruiter feedback patterns and review discussions.

85+

Strong Signal

Clear narrative, quantified impact, clean presentation. You're competing at the top.

70-84

Solid

Good foundation, but opportunities to sharpen. Usually 1-2 key improvements will push you up.

<70

Needs Work

Significant friction points that may cause quick rejections. Focus on the highest-leverage fixes first.

The bottom line

Your resume is not a document. It is a first impression compressed into a page. In those 7.4 seconds, a recruiter forms a hypothesis about you. Our job is to make sure that hypothesis is accurate and compelling.1

The 7.4-Second Signal Model isn't about gaming algorithms or stuffing keywords. It's about telling your story clearly enough that the right recruiter can recognize it instantly.

Limitations

  • Scores are heuristic and should be read alongside the narrative feedback.
  • Industry and role context can change what matters most.
  • Systemic factors are outside the scope of a resume score.

FAQ

Is the score a guarantee?

No. The score is a structured signal model, not a promise of outcomes.

Why weight story highest?

Recruiters pattern-match fast. A coherent story reduces ambiguity in the initial screen.

Can I game the score?

You can improve clarity and evidence, but gaming language without proof usually backfires.


How Recruiter in Your Pocket applies this

01

The 7.4-Second Verdict

Your overall score reflects the signal strength a recruiter perceives in those crucial first moments.

02

Signal Analysis

We break down Story, Impact, Clarity, and Readability so you know exactly where to focus.

Sources

  1. TheLadders Eye-Tracking Study (2018 Update) - TheLadders (2018).
  2. TheLadders Eye-Tracking Study - TheLadders (2012).

See what your resume looks like

Run Free Analysis