All research
Methodology/2 peer-reviewed studies

How the report score works

Your score summarizes the resume review. The written findings explain what is clear, what is missing, and where to start.

A score tied to visible evidence

The number is the summary. The four diagnostics and the quoted evidence explain what drove it.

Worked example

85

Clear and specific

Your responsibilities are clear. Add how many people or teams were involved in the improvements you describe.

“Led onboarding across teams” leaves two questions: which teams, and what improved?

Each recommendation points to the wording that needs attention.

How the score is explained

Four parts of the review

These scores summarize the feedback. They do not predict interviews or offers.

  1. Story

    84 / 100

    Can a reader follow your career and understand what role you want next?

    The career progression is clear, but the target role is not named at the top.

    84%
  2. Impact

    82 / 100

    Does the resume show what changed because of the work?

    Two bullets describe improvements without saying how many people or teams were involved.

    82%
  3. Clarity

    88 / 100

    Is it clear what you were responsible for?

    The candidate's decisions and responsibilities are consistently specific.

    88%
  4. Readability

    90 / 100

    Can a reader find your roles, dates, and results quickly?

    Headings, dates, and recent experience are easy to scan.

    90%
  1. Evidence

    What the resume actually says

  2. Review

    What is clear and what remains open

  3. First action

    The most useful place to begin

Fig. 1 / Illustrative reportUse the written feedback to decide what to change first.

What we look for

A recruiter should be able to tell what kind of work you do, what you owned, how large or complex the work was, and what changed because of it.

We look for those details in your resume. If one is missing, we point out the question instead of guessing.

That whole-document view matters. In one recruiter study, judgments changed when reviewers saw real resumes rather than stripped-down candidate profiles, which is why the written review stays attached to the document's context.1

What comes from research, and what is ours

The cited studies inform the whole-document review and our view of first-pass attention. The scoring method itself is ours.

What comes from research
How real resumes can change recruiter judgments, and how attention moves during an initial review.
What we designed
We chose the four dimensions, the score bands, and how the evidence is organized in the report.

Why the overall score is not a simple average

Clean formatting does not answer a missing question about what you did. Uneven writing does not erase a well-supported achievement. We consider how the strengths and gaps affect the resume as a whole, rather than averaging the four categories.

What the scores mean

We set these score ranges as part of our review method. They organize the findings; they do not predict hiring outcomes.

85+

Clear and specific

The career story, ownership, results, and structure are consistently easy to understand.

70-84

Mostly clear

Most of the document is understandable, with a few important details still missing or buried.

<70

Needs more context

Several parts of the document are difficult to evaluate. Start with the first recommended change.

How to use the score

Start with the first recommended change and check it against your experience. In a 2023 eye-tracking study, longer review time and attention to the Experience section were associated with resumes moving forward. That study informed our interest in how recruiters review experience; it did not test our score or prove that an edit causes more attention.2

Use the score alongside the feedback. If an edit raises the number but makes the resume less accurate, do not use it.

Limitations

  • The scores are guideposts, not predictions. Read them with the written feedback.
  • Industry and role context can change what matters most.
  • A resume score cannot account for bias, referrals, the job market, or an employer's hiring process.

Common questions

Does the score predict interviews?

No. It summarizes our review of this resume. It is not hiring odds, an ATS score, or a promise of outcomes.

Why these four dimensions?

Together they cover whether a reader can follow the career story, see results, understand ownership, and find the useful evidence quickly.

Should I optimize for the number?

No. Use the written findings to improve the document. A higher number without a clearer, more accurate resume is not useful.

What this means in your report

01

First impression

The opening view shows what is clear, what may make a recruiter pause, and what to fix first.

02

Score breakdown

Story, Impact, Clarity, and Readability show which parts of the document need attention.

Sources and related research

Apply it to your resume

Find out where your resume needs more detail.

Review my resume