Back to Research
Eye-tracking research
Read time4 min readUpdatedDecember 2025

How Recruiters Actually Read Resumes

Eye tracking research on how recruiters review resumes in real time.

The Key Finding

7.4 Seconds

The 2018 update reports an average 7.4 second initial screen for fit or no fit.1

Sample
2012 study: 30 professional recruiters reviewing 300+ resumes2

Visualizing the 7.4 Seconds

The composite view below blends the 2012 heatmap detail with the 2018 timing update. The red zones show the most intense fixation.2

Heatmap
Fig. 2 — Attention DensityAggregated Recruiter Fixation Points

TheLadders published its original eye tracking study in 2012 and reported roughly 6 seconds for the initial screen. The 2018 update reported 7.4 seconds. We use the 7.4-second figure for timing and keep the 2012 report as the best source for heatmap detail.12Read the 2018 update and the 2012 report.

The skim pattern

Recruiters are not reading every bullet point. They are scanning for fast answers: Who is this person now? Where do they work? What is their title? How long have they been doing it?2

More recent research shows that time spent on specific sections can predict approval outcomes in controlled settings.3

Where eyes actually look

1. Name & Title

The name/title area receives the longest fixation time during the initial scan.2

2. Current Role

After the header, eyes move to the most recent job, title, company, and dates.2

3. Layout Quality

Resumes with clear headings and consistent formatting got more focused attention.2

4. Dense Text

Recruiter lens: dense paragraphs often receive less attention during the initial skim.

Definition: the initial screen

The initial screen is the first pass where a recruiter decides whether a resume is worth deeper time. It is a fast filter, not a final verdict. The goal is to make the right signals visible in the first moments.1

What this means for resume design

Put the most important evidence where the eye naturally goes: the header and the first role block. Make role titles, companies, and measurable outcomes easy to pick up without reading full sentences.

Limitations

  • Eye-tracking samples are limited and do not represent every industry.
  • Scanning behavior varies by role, seniority, and volume of applicants.
  • This describes first-pass behavior, not the later deep review.

FAQ

What does the 7.4-second screen actually mean?

It is the average initial screen duration reported in the 2018 update. It is not the final decision, but it often determines whether deeper review happens.

Do recruiters really ignore the bottom half of the page?

Eye-tracking shows attention concentrates on the header and most recent role. Lower sections still matter, but they are less likely to be seen in the first pass.

Is this true for every industry?

No. The cited studies are helpful but limited in sample and context. Use them to guide structure, not as universal rules.


How Recruiter in Your Pocket uses this research

01

Recruiter First Impression

We explicitly model the first-impression window to show you what stands out.

02

Bullet Upgrades

We push numbers to the front because that is where the eye naturally falls.

Sources

  1. TheLadders Eye-Tracking Study (2018 Update) - TheLadders (2018).
  2. TheLadders Eye-Tracking Study - TheLadders (2012).
  3. Using Machine Learning with Eye-Tracking Data to Predict if a Recruiter Will Approve a Resume - MDPI Applied Sciences (2023).

See what your resume looks like

Run Free Analysis